Why is The Hobbit receiving such lack luster reviews?


- see overlong, overbearing, , not inventive. film welcome ignore critics @ times.

peter travers of rolling stone: "part 1 of director peter jackson's planned film trilogy of j.r.r. tolkien's hobbit forces audiences run obstacle course before fun kicks in."

mick lasalle of san francisco chronicle: "if loved earlier films, these moments hold on to, they're few, , they're not enough."

joe morgenstern of wall street journal :"an overlong adventure enlivened wonders."

a.o. scott of new york times: "tolkien's inventive, episodic tale of modest homebody on dangerous journey has been turned overscale , plodding spectacle."

i loved first film. people comparing lotr series without understanding hobbit book different lotr books. essence of children's fantasy novel while lotr epic high fantasy novel. it's hard compare 2 in sense.


News & Events Media & Journalism Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does this korean magazine says? can someone translate it for me? whos on the cover?

Is glass fibre really made from glass?

Need advice on photography equipment!?